4.2 Article

A Mutation in PEX19 Causes a Severe Clinical Phenotype in a Patient With Peroxisomal Biogenesis Disorder

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
卷 152A, 期 9, 页码 2318-2321

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33560

关键词

peroxisomal biogenesis disorder; mutation; PEX19 gene

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peroxisomal biogenesis disorders (PBD) are groups of inherited neurometabolic disorders caused by defects in PEX genes. We report on a female infant, born to a consanguineous parents (first degree cousins), who presented with inactivity, poor sucking, and hypotonia early in the neonatal period. She had subtle dysmorphic features. Liver function tests were impaired with raised liver enzymes, conjugated and unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia. CT of the brain showed diffuse bilateral changes. She developed seizures with an abnormal EEG. Plasma very long chain fatty acid analysis showed high C26:0 levels and increasedC26:0/C22:0 and C24:0/C22:0 ratios, which is consistent with a PBD. Studies in fibroblasts including plasmalogen biosynthesis, peroxisomal fatty acid alfa and beta oxidation confirmed the diagnosis of PBD. Immunofluoresence microscopy revealed the absence of peroxisomes in fibroblasts. The patient was assigned to the PEX19 complementation group. Subsequent mutation analysis of the PEX19 gene revealed homozygosity for a c.320delA frameshift mutation. The patient had a stormy course with multiple admissions to the pediatric intensive care unit with pneumonia, liver impairment, sepsis, and epilepsy. At 1 year of age she developed metabolic acidosis with normal anion gap, proteinuria, aminoaciduria, and glucosuria consistent with a renal tubular defect. Abdominal ultrasound showed multiple gallstones. Other causes of gallstones like haemoglobinopathy were excluded. So far, only two siblings had been reported with mutations in the PEX19 gene. Our patient showed a previously unrecognized association of gallstones and a renal tubular defect with a PBD. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据