4.5 Article

Cholinesterase Inhibitors for Alzheimer Disease: Do They Provide More Than Symptomatic Benefits?

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 266-273

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181e56d30

关键词

Cholinesterase inhibitors; Alzheimer disease; mortality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: This study aims to examine survival of patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) receiving clinical efficacy of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) and to compare their survival with those of patients with AD who never received ChEIs and cognitively intact old psychiatric outpatients. Design, Setting, and Participants: The retrospective cohort study used national mortality data provided by the Korean National Statistics Office and electronic database of 15 general hospitals on older patients who began outpatient treatment with psychiatric medications including ChEIs (N = 3,813). The authors controlled for confounding by using multivariate models and propensity scoring methods. Measurements: Mortality rate of patients with AD receiving ChEIs was compared with those of patients with AD who never received ChEIs and cognitively intact old psychiatric outpatients. Results: Observed additional survival of patients with AD receiving ChEIs (mortality rate: 13.1%), when compared with patients with AD who never received ChEIs (15.4%) was not statistically significant (p = 0.74; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-1.59). Patients with AD receiving ChEIs showed higher mortality rate (13.1%) compared with that of cognitively intact old psychiatric outpatients (8.6%) (p < 0.001; HR: 1.60, 95% CI: 0.96-2.68). Conclusion: This study does not support that ChEIs increase survival of patients with AD, compared with patients with AD who have never treated with ChEIs. Therefore, all ChEIs should be considered for symptomatic use only and not to be capable of modifying mortality of patients with AD. (Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2011; 19:266-273)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据