4.7 Article

Increasing Incidence of Celiac Disease in a North American Population

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 108, 期 5, 页码 818-824

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2013.60

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Society of Medicine
  2. Swedish Research Council Medicine [522-2A09-195]
  3. Swedish Celiac Society
  4. Fulbright commission
  5. American College of Gastroenterology Junior Faculty Development Award
  6. National Institutes of Health [DK057892]
  7. National Institute on Aging [R01 AG034676]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of celiac disease (CD) varies greatly, potentially because of incomplete ascertainment of cases and small study samples with limited statistical power. Previous reports indicate that the incidence of CD is increasing. We examined the prevalence of CD in a well-defined US county. METHODS: Population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA. Using the infrastructure of the Rochester Epidemiology Project, medical, histopathology, and CD serology records were used to identify all new cases of CD in Olmsted County since 2000. Age-and sex-specific and adjusted (to the US white 2000 population) incidence rates for CD were estimated. Clinical presentation at diagnosis was also assessed. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2010, 249 individuals (157 female or 63%, median age 37.9 years) were diagnosed with CD in Olmsted County. The overall age-and sex-adjusted incidence of CD in the study period was 17.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 15.2-19.6) per 100,000 person-years, increasing from 11.1 (95 % CI = 6.8-15.5) in 2000-2001 to 17.3 (95% CI = 13.3-21.3) in 2008-2010. The temporal trend in incidence rates was modeled as a two-slope pattern, with the incidence leveling off after 2004. Based on the two classic CD symptoms of diarrhea and weight loss, the relative frequency of classical CD among incident cases decreased over time between 2000 and 2010 (P=0.044). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of CD has continued to increase in the past decade in a North-American population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据