Are Fecal Immunochemical Test Characteristics Influenced by Sample Return Time? A Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Trial
出版年份 2011 全文链接
标题
Are Fecal Immunochemical Test Characteristics Influenced by Sample Return Time? A Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Trial
作者
关键词
-
出版物
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 107, Issue 1, Pages 99-107
出版商
Springer Nature
发表日期
2011-11-22
DOI
10.1038/ajg.2011.396
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Targeted, Updated Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
- (2013) Evelyn P. Whitlock et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Evaluating Test Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
- (2013) Ann G. Zauber et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Comparative Evaluation of Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Adenoma Detection
- (2013) Sabrina Hundt ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Efficacy and Tolerability of Split-Dose Magnesium Citrate: Low-Volume (2 Liters) Polyethylene Glycol vs. Single- or Split-Dose Polyethylene Glycol Bowel Preparation for Morning Colonoscopy
- (2010) Sin Sil Park et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Performance improvements of stool-based screening tests
- (2010) Leonie van Dam et al. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Diagnostic Yield Improves With Collection of 2 Samples in Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening Without Affecting Attendance
- (2010) Aafke H.C. van Roon et al. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Influence of seasonal variations in ambient temperatures on performance of immunochemical faecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: observational study from the Florence district
- (2010) G. Grazzini et al. GUT
- Colorectal cancer screening adherence is higher with fecal immunochemical tests than guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests: A randomized, controlled trial☆
- (2010) Richard M. Hoffman et al. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Identification of colorectal adenomas by a quantitative immunochemical faecal occult blood screening test depends on adenoma characteristics, development threshold used and number of tests performed
- (2009) P. ROZEN et al. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
- Comparison of a guaiac and an immunochemical faecal occult blood test for the detection of colonic lesions according to lesion type and location
- (2009) L Guittet et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Screening for colorectal cancer: random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing at different cut-off levels
- (2009) L Hol et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Cutoff value determines the performance of a semi-quantitative immunochemical faecal occult blood test in a colorectal cancer screening programme
- (2009) L G M van Rossum et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Worldwide Variations in Colorectal Cancer
- (2009) M. M. Center et al. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS
- Cancer Statistics, 2009
- (2009) A. Jemal et al. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS
- Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy
- (2009) L Hol et al. GUT
- False negative fecal occult blood tests due to delayed sample return in colorectal cancer screening
- (2009) Leo G.M. van Rossum et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Cochrane Systematic Review of Colorectal Cancer Screening Using the Fecal Occult Blood Test (Hemoccult): An Update
- (2008) Paul Hewitson et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Random Comparison of Guaiac and Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer in a Screening Population
- (2008) Leo G. van Rossum et al. GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Effect of delay in sampling on haemoglobin determined by faecal immunochemical tests
- (2008) L. F Brown et al. ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started