4.7 Article

Insulin Resistance in Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 104, 期 1, 页码 76-82

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2008.9

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: Chronic hepatitis C virus infection is associated with insulin resistance (IR), and both host and viral factors are important in its development. The association and the predictors of IR in chronic hepatitis B virus (CHBV) infection remain unclear. METHODS: A total of 69 CHBV-infected subjects were examined to study the relationship between histological findings and anthropometric and biochemical data, including IR determined by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR). To assess the influence of CHBV infection on IR independent of any effect of hepatic fibrosis, overweight, or sex we also compared fasting serum insulin, C-peptide, HOMA-IR, HOMA-beta (measure of beta-cell function) and C-peptide-insulin ratio (to distinguish impaired insulin degradation (low ratio) from insulin hypersecretion (normal ratio)) levels between the subset of 14 male normal weight (body mass index, BMI < 23) CHBV patients with stage 0 or 1 hepatic fibrosis and 50 male normal weight healthy controls matched by age and anthropometry (BMI and waist circumference). RESULTS: A total of 31 (44.9 %) CHBV-infected patients were overweight (BMI> 23 kg/m(2)) and 18 (26.1 %) were obese (BMI> 25 kg/m(2)). IR was seen in 34 (49.3 %) patients. BMI (Spearman's coefficient = -0.436; P < 0.001) and serum triglyceride levels (Spearman's coefficient = -0.307; P = 0.010) were univariate predictors of IR. In multiple linear regression analysis, only BMI (P < 0.001) was an independent predictor of HOMA-IR. The subgroup of CHBV-infected patients and the controls had comparable levels of all markers of IR, including fasting glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and HOMA-IR. CONCLUSIONS: IR in CHBV-infected patients is a reflection of the host metabolic profile and CHBV infection is not in itself correlated with IR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据