4.6 Article

Neighborhood Amenities and Mobility in Older Adults

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 178, 期 5, 页码 761-769

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwt032

关键词

aging; mobility limitation; residence characteristics

资金

  1. Association of Schools of Public Health
  2. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Environmental Health Scholarship Program
  3. National Institute on Aging [AG028254]
  4. Drexel University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diversity of neighborhood amenities may promote the mobility of older adults. A 2010 community-based sample of 510 adults aged >= 65 years in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and geospatial data from the Esri Business Analyst database (Esri, Inc., Redlands, California) were used to assess associations of neighborhood amenity diversity with mobility. Neighborhoods were defined by census tract, and diversity of amenities was derived by using the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design's neighborhood development index (US Green Building Council, Washington, DC). Generalized estimating equations adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, and neighborhood characteristics were used to estimate differences in mobility score by tertile of amenity diversity. Analyses were stratified by participants' routine travel habits (stayed at home, stayed in home zip code, or traveled beyond home zip code). We found that for those who spent most of their time in their home neighborhoods, mobility scores (from the Life-Space Assessment, which ranges from 0 to 104 points) were 8.3 points higher (95% confidence interval: 0.1, 16.6) among those who lived in neighborhoods with the most amenity diversity compared with those who lived in neighborhoods with the least amenity diversity. No significant associations between amenity diversity and mobility were observed for those who did not leave home or who regularly traveled outside their neighborhoods. Neighborhoods with a high diversity of amenities may be important promoters of mobility in older adults who do not routinely travel outside their neighborhoods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据