4.6 Article

Is There an Association Between Low-to-Moderate Alcohol Consumption and Risk of Cognitive Decline?

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 172, 期 6, 页码 708-716

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq187

关键词

aged; alcohol drinking; cognition; dementia; follow-up studies; risk

资金

  1. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria, Ministerio de Sanidad, Madrid, Spain [94-1562, 97-1321E, 98-0103, 01-0255]
  2. Direccion General de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnica, Secretaria General de Universidades, Madrid, Spain [CICYT SAF93-0453]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The authors evaluated the association of low-to-moderate alcohol consumption with risk of cognitive decline in a census-based cohort study of men and women aged >= 55 years conducted in Zaragoza, Spain (1994-1999). Participants free of dementia at baseline (N = 3,888) were examined after 2.5 and 4.5 years of follow-up. Information on alcohol intake was collected with the EURODEM Risk Factors Questionnaire and the History and Aetiology Schedule. The study endpoint was severe cognitive decline, defined as loss of >= 1 point/ year on the Mini-Mental State Examination or a diagnosis of incident dementia (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV, Text Revision criteria). Compared with those for abstainers, the multivariate-adjusted odds ratios for severe cognitive decline for male drinkers of <12 g alcohol/day, drinkers of 12-24 g alcohol/day, and former drinkers were 0.61 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31, 1.20), 1.19 (95% CI: 0.61, 2.32), and 1.03 (95% CI: 0.59, 1.82), respectively. The corresponding odds ratios for women were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.45, 1.72), 2.38 (95% CI: 0.98, 5.77), and 1.03 (95% CI: 0.48, 2.23). This study did not support the hypothesis that low-to-moderate alcohol consumption prevents cognitive decline. The inverse association between low-to-moderate alcohol intake and cognitive decline observed in other studies may have been due to inclusion of former drinkers in the abstainers reference category.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据