4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Identification of an age cutoff for increased mortality in patients with elderly trauma

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 151-158

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.10.027

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The chosen age cutoff for considering patients with trauma to be elderly has ranged from 55 to 80 years in trauma guidelines and studies. The goal of this study was to identify at what age mortality truly increases for older victims of trauma. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of the Ohio Trauma Registry, a statewide database of all injured patients who died or were admitted for more than 48 hours to both trauma and nontrauma centers. Patients 16 years or older entered into the registry between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2006, were included. Inhospital mortality rates were obtained and stratified by 5-year age intervals and by injury severity score (ISS). Rates between age groups were compared using logistic regression to identify significant differences in mortality. Results: Included were 75 658 patients. In logistic regression, patients 70 to 74 years of age had significantly greater mortality than all younger age groups when stratified by ISS (P <= 001-.004). When considering other 5-year age groups as referent (40-44, 45-49, 50-54, 55-59, 60-64, 65-69 years old), no other group was associated with significantly increased mortality, as compared to younger groups (P>.05 for all). Conclusion: Patients 70 to 74 years of age have significantly greater mortality than all younger age groups when stratified by ISS. Age cutoffs based on younger ages are not associated with significant increases in mortality. An age of 70 years should be considered as an appropriate cutoff for considering a patient to be elderly in future studies of trauma and development of geriatric trauma triage criteria. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据