4.1 Article

Different Patterns of Expression of the erbB Family of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases in Common Nevi, Dysplastic Nevi, and Primary Malignant Melanomas: An Immunohistochemical Study

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOPATHOLOGY
卷 32, 期 7, 页码 665-675

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/DAD.0b013e3181d1e6f0

关键词

malignant melanoma; erbB receptor family; common nevi; dysplastic nevi

资金

  1. Israel Cancer Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

erbB receptors contribute to tumor formation and progression. Variable expression of erbB1, erbB2, and erbB3 has been reported in nevi and melanomas; erbB4 has hardly been investigated. We examined the expression of all 4 erbB receptors in common and dysplastic nevi and melanomas. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues of 100 melanomas, 27 common nevi, and 23 dysplastic nevi were immunostained with antibodies against the 4 erbB receptors. erbB3 and erbB4 showed stronger positivity in nevi than in melanomas, and in common than in dysplastic nevi. Staining pattern was more orderly in nevi than in melanomas. Common nevi showed more prominent membranous staining for erbB3 than dysplastic nevi followed by melanomas. In melanomas, greater thickness was associated with more widespread erbB2 and erbB3 staining in the vertical than in the radial growth phase, and in the dermal than in the epidermal component. Higher mitotic counts were associated with more widespread and intense erbB2 expression in the vertical growth phase than in the radial growth phase and in the dermal than in the epidermal component. Melanomas with more widespread erbB2 staining had heavier lymphocytic infiltrates. erbB1 expression was negligible in all groups. erbB2, erbB3, and erbB4 are expressed in all subtypes of melanocytic lesions, but with quantitative and qualitative differences. Receptor expression seems to decrease and to become less mature and orderly with tumor progression. The complex patterns of erbB receptor expression in melanocytic lesions warrant further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据