4.7 Article

Electroacupuncture at ST36 Increases Contraction of the Gastric Antrum and Improves the SCF/c-kit Pathway in Diabetic Rats

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
卷 41, 期 6, 页码 1233-1249

出版社

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0192415X13500833

关键词

Electroacupuncture; Interstitial Cells of Cajal; Gastric Contraction; SCF/c-kit Pathway

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30670775, 81270458]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electroacupuncture (EA) at ST36 is effective for improving gastric motility. However, the underlying mechanism remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of EA on gastric contraction and to determine whether interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs) are involved. Rats were randomized into control, diabetic (DM), diabetic with sham EA (DM+SEA), diabetic with low frequency EA (DM + LEA) and diabetic with high frequency EA (DM+HEA) groups. EA was performed everyday for four and eight weeks. Contractions in antrum strips were explored using the organ bath technique. Western blotting was employed to determine c-kit and transmembrane stem cell factor (M-SCF) expression in the gastric antrum, and levels of soluble stem cell factor (S-SCF) in serum were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The distribution of ICCs was further assessed by immunohistochemistry. The results were as follows: (1) Contractions in the DM group were attenuated at four and eight weeks, but LEA and HEA restored the attenuated contraction. (2) ICCs were significantly decreased at eight weeks without alteration at four weeks in DM group, but were rescued in the LEA and HEA groups. (3) Whereas M-SCF and S-SCF in the DM group were slightly decreased at four weeks and were dramatically reduced at eight weeks, LEA and HEA markedly enhanced SCF at eight weeks. Collectively, the data suggest that in diabetic rats, LEA and HEA at ST36 could facilitate contraction of the gastric antrum, possibly by involving the SCF/c-kit pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据