4.5 Article

Bleeding risk associated with 1 year of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation (CREDO) trial

期刊

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 157, 期 2, 页码 369-374

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.09.011

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. Incremental reductions in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events may be partially offset by an increased incidence of bleeding in the months after a PCI. Methods We examined the incidence, severity, and predictors of bleeding associated with 1 year of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI among 1,816 patients in the Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Event During Observation (CREDO) trial. We also compared bleeding in patients who received dual antiplatelet therapy for I year to those who did so for only 4 weeks. Bleeding was categorized as major or minor using the modified Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Study Group criteria. Results Major or minor bleeding occurred in 146 patients during 1 year of follow-up. More than 80% of bleeding events were periprocedural. Multivariable predictors of any bleeding included increasing age and coronary artery bypass. Any (major or minor) bleeding occurred in 71 (8.1%) and 77 (8.9%), major bleeding in 34 (3.9%) and 49 (5.6%), and minor bleeding in 37 (4.2%) and 29 (3.3%) of placebo- and clopidogrel-treated patients, respectively; these differences were not significant. However, major gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in significantly more clopidogrel- than placebo-treated patients (13 [1.4%] vs 3 [0.3 %] [P =. 011]). Conclusions Adding clopidogrel to aspirin beyond 4 weeks post PCI is not associated with a significant increase in the overall rate of major or minor bleeding, although it is associated with an increase in major gastrointestinal bleeding in the year after a PCI. (Am Heart J 2009; 157:369-74.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据