4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Current status of cardiac rehabilitation in Latin America and the Caribbean

期刊

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 158, 期 3, 页码 480-487

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.06.020

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in Latin America is increasing and contributes importantly to the global burden of cardiovascular diseases. Advanced resources for the diagnosis and treatment of CAD are available in most of the region. However, preventive approaches such as cardiovascular rehabilitation programs (CVRP) may not be widely implemented. Methods We carried out a telephone-based survey to hospitals sampled in a random and population-weighted fashion from a list of 202 centers with cardiac catheterization laboratories in Mexico, Central and South America, and the Caribbean. We collected information of availability of cardiac procedures and imaging techniques and also extensive data about the presence, characteristics, and quality measures of CVRP. Results A total of 98 centers were contacted, and a complete survey was provided by 59 centers (60%) from 13 countries. Cardiovascular rehabilitation programs were available in only 56% of centers. There were no differences between centers with and without CVRP regarding type of hospital, availability of cardiac surgery, and annual volume of patients with myocardial infarction. Among centers with CVRP, 70% offered all phases of CVRP. The lack of CVRP was attributed to lack of qualified personnel in 41% of centers, financial constraints in 33%, and lack of physical space in 13%. All centers without CVRP performed cardiac surgery and percutaneous interventions. Conclusions Despite the presence of state-of-the-art technology for the diagnosis and treatment of CAD, availability of CVRP, a less expensive yet effective tool for the treatment of CAD, appears to be limited in Latin America and the Caribbean. (Am Heart J 2009;158:480-7.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据