4.1 Article

Cardiovascular Risk Factors Cause Cortical Thinning in Cognitively Impaired Patients Relationships Among Cardiovascular Risk Factors, White Matter Hyperintensities, and Cortical Atrophy

期刊

ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 106-112

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e31822e0831

关键词

hypertension; diabetes mellitus; hyperlipidemia; white matter hyperintensities; cortical thickness

资金

  1. Ministry for Health, Welfare & Family Affairs, Republic of Korea [A050079]
  2. Korean Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) NRL
  3. Korean government (MEST) [R0A-2007-000-20068-0]
  4. Samsung Medical Center [CRL-108011, CRS 110-14-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cardiovascular risk factors are associated with cognitive impairments. However, the effects of cardiovascular risk factors on the topography of cortical thinning have not yet been studied in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the topography of cortical thinning related to cardiovascular risk factors and the relationships among cardiovascular risk factors, white matter hyperintensities (WMH), and cortical atrophy. Participants included 226 patients with Alzheimer disease or subcortical vascular dementia and 135 patients with amnestic MCI or subcortical vascular MCI. We automatically measured the volume of WMH and cortical thickness. Hypertension was associated with cortical thinning in the frontal and perisylvian regions, and cortical thinning related to diabetes mellitus (DM) occurred in the frontal region. In path analyses, hypertension accounted for 0.04 of the frontal thinning with the mediation of WMH and 0.16 without the mediation of WMH. In case of DM, it accounted for 0.02 of the frontal thinning with the mediation of WMH and 0.13 without the mediation of WMH. Hypertension and DM predominantly affected frontal thinning both with and without the mediation of WMH, where the effects without the mediation of WMH were greater than those with the mediation of WMH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据