4.6 Article

Tolerance of a cow's milk-based hydrolyzed formula in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis triggered by milk

期刊

ALLERGY
卷 68, 期 8, 页码 1065-1072

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/all.12200

关键词

eosinophilic esophagitis; food allergy; hydrolyzed formula; milk allergy; milk proteins

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Cow's milk protein, a major food trigger for EoE in both children and adults, should be continuously avoided once identified as such. This study evaluates tolerance of a cow's milk-based extensively hydrolyzed formula (eHF) with regard to disease remission maintenance in adult patients with milk-triggered EoE. Methods: Seventeen adult patients in whom cow's milk was consecutively demonstrated to trigger EoE after an empiric six-food elimination diet-based study protocol and who subsequently maintained disease remission were prospectively recruited. They were given 400ml of a cow's milk-based eHF daily for 8weeks. Intraepithelial peak eosinophil and blood eosinophil counts, esophageal-related symptoms, serum total and specific IgE to major milk proteins, and eosinophil cationic protein were monitored before and after eHF intake. Results: Thirteen male and four female patients aged 17-56 completed the study protocol. 15 patients (88.24%) achieved and maintained EoE remission, while an infiltration of 15 eosinophils/hpf reappeared in the remaining two patients. No differences in age, gender, symptoms, and endoscopic appearance at baseline conditions or personal/family allergic background were observed between those patients who tolerated the eHF and those who did not. Symptom scores did not significantly change after eHF intake and were significantly lower than those documented at baseline conditions or after cow's milk challenge. No differences were documented in blood eosinophil counts or serum markers after eHF intake. Conclusion: Most adult patients with EoE triggered by cow's milk tolerate a cow's milk-based eHF, thus providing them with a safe, economical alternative to cow's milk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据