4.7 Review

Review article: gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis - physiological foundations, technical aspects and clinical implications

期刊

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 30, 期 7, 页码 681-694

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04082.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medtronic
  2. TAP
  3. Smart Pill, EZM
  4. Takeda
  5. NIH
  6. National Institutes of Health [DK58185]
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK058185] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>Background Application of electrical stimulation to the gut, primarily the stomach, has rapidly advanced in the last two decades, from mostly animal studies to the clinical arena. Most studies focused on the use of electrical stimulation for gastroparesis, the only approved indication for such intervention. Aim To review the physiological basis of gastric electrical activity and the technical aspects and clinical outcome of gastric electrical stimulation (GES) for gastroparesis. Methods PubMed search from 1966 to 2009, using gastroparesis and GES as search terms. Areas in focus were systematically reviewed. Results The literature consists of open-label studies, mostly from single centres, published in the last decade. Improvement in symptoms, quality of life and nutritional status was reported by most studies. Physiologically, stimulation parameters approved in clinical practice do not regulate gastric slow wave activity and have inconsistent effect on gastric emptying. The mechanism of action of GES is not fully known, but data support modulation of gastric biomechanical activity and afferent neural mechanisms. Conclusions Gastric electrical stimulation is a helpful intervention in recalcitrant gastroparesis. Controlled studies and better understanding of mechanisms of action of electrical stimulation are needed to evaluate further the clinical utility of this intervention and to exploit its therapeutic potential better.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据