4.7 Article

The effect of functional gastrointestinal disorders on psychological comorbidity and quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

期刊

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 475-483

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03754.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. AstraZeneca Ply Ltd
  2. Aventis Pharma Ply Lid
  3. Bayer Australia Ltd
  4. Pfizer Pty Ltd
  5. Schering Plough
  6. Altana
  7. Arydepharm
  8. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  9. Zeria
  10. Novartis
  11. Discipline of General Practice and the School of Psychology at the University of Adelaide
  12. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology at the Royal Adelaide Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Symptoms of functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) are common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Psychological comorbidities of anxiety and depression are also highly prevalent in IBD. Aim To quantify the burden of FGIDs in a hospital-based cohort of patients with IBD and to determine whether there is any inter-relationship between the presence and number of FGIDs and patients' quality of life or psychological status. Methods A cross-sectional Survey of 6 1 out-patients was performed. Data on psychological status, quality of life, disease activity and functional symptoms according to Rome III criteria were collected. Results Overall, 49 (80%) participants met Rome III criteria for a functional bowel disorder and 52% of participants met criteria for more than one FGID. Participants with no FGID had significantly better physical quality of life than those with more than two FGIDs (P = 0.025). However, there was no relationship among the number of FGIDs, mental quality of life, anxiety or depression. Conclusions Functional gastrointestinal disorders are highly prevalent in out-patients with IBD. Somewhat unexpectedly, the presence of anxiety and/or depression did not appear to correlate with either the presence or the number of FGIDs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据