4.7 Article

Hyaluronic acid/chitosan nanoparticles for delivery of curcuminoid and its in vitro evaluation in glioma cells

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.10.039

关键词

Curcuminoid; Polyelectrolyte complex nanoparticles; Brain gliomas

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20130655]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University [SKLNMKF201204]
  3. College Students Innovation Project for the R&D of Novel Drugs [J1030830]
  4. National College Students' innovation entrepreneurial training program [G13076]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this work was to evaluate the potential of polyelectrolyte complex nanoparticles (PENPs) based on hyaluronic acid/chitosan (HA/CS) as carriers for water-insoluble curcuminoid (CUR) and explore in vitro performance against brain glioma cells. PENPs were observed to be affected by the order of addition, mass ratios and initial concentrations of the HA/CS, pH and ionic strength. PENPs remained stable over a temperature range of 5-55 (C. CUR was successfully encapsulated into the PENPs. CUR-PENPs showed spherical shape with a mean diameter of 207 nm and positive charge of 25.37 mV. High encapsulation efficiency (89.9%) and drug loading (6.5%) was achieved. Drug release studies revealed initial burst release of drug from the PENPs up to 4 h followed by sustained release pattern. DSC thermograms and XRD patterns showed that CUR was encapsulated inside the PENPs in a molecular or amorphous state. Compared with CUR-solution. CUR-PENPs showed stronger dose dependent cytotoxicity against C6 glioma cells and higher performance in uptake efficiency in C6 cells. Cellular uptake of CUR-PENPs was found to be governed by multi-mechanism in C6 cells, involving active endocytosis, macropinocytosis, clathrin-, caveolae-, and CD44-mediated endocytosis. In conclusion, CUR-PENPs might be a promising carrier for therapy of brain gliomas. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据