4.2 Article

Acute Alcohol Produces Ataxia and Cognitive Impairments in Aged Animals: A Comparison Between Young Adult and Aged Rats

期刊

ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 37, 期 8, 页码 1317-1324

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acer.12110

关键词

Aging; Ethanol; Rotarod; Righting Reflex; Water Maze

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Aging in both humans and rodents appears to be accompanied by physiological changes that increase biologic sensitivity to ethanol EtOH) intoxication. However, animal models designed to investigate this increased alcohol sensitivity have yet to be established. For this reason, we sought to determine whether acute EtOH administration produces differential effects on motor coordination and spatial cognition in young adult and aged rats. Methods: Male young adult postnatal day 70 to 72) and aged (similar to 18 months) Sprague-Dawley rats were assessed on 2 motor tasks the accelerating rotarod [RR] and the aerial righting reflex [ARR]) and a single cognitive performance task the Morris water maze [MWM]). Following acute EtOH exposure via intraperitoneal injection, animals' performance was reassessed. Results: Aged rats showed a dramatic increase in EtOH-induced ataxia on the RR and the ARR relative to young adult animals. Similarly, results from the MWM revealed that aged animals had slightly greater EtOH-induced impairments compared with young adult animals. Importantly, the increased impairments produced by EtOH were not due to differential blood EtOH levels. Conclusions: We demonstrate for the first time that aged rats show greater EtOH-induced deficits compared with young adults in tasks of motor and cognitive performance. The possible role of protein kinase C as a mechanism for increased sensitivity to the motor-impairing effects of EtOH is discussed. Given the high prevalence of alcohol use among the elderly, increased vulnerability to alcohol-induced deficits may have a profound effect on injury in this population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据