4.2 Article

Zinc-Dependent Modulation of α2-and α3-Glycine Receptor Subunits by Ethanol

期刊

ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 37, 期 12, 页码 2002-2010

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acer.12192

关键词

Glycine Receptor; Ethanol; Zinc

资金

  1. [5R01AA006399]
  2. [5R01AA013378]
  3. [1F31AA019852]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundStrychnine-sensitive glycine receptors (GlyRs) are expressed throughout the brain and spinal cord and are among the strongly supported protein targets of alcohol. This is based largely on studies of the 1-subunit; however, 2- and 3-GlyR subunits are as or more abundantly expressed than 1-GlyRs in multiple forebrain brain areas considered to be important for alcohol-related behaviors, and uniquely some 3-GlyRs undergo RNA editing. Nanomolar and low micromolar concentrations of zinc ions potentiate GlyR function, and in addition to zinc's effects on glycine-activated currents, we have recently shown that physiological concentrations of zinc also enhance the magnitude of ethanol (EtOH)'s effects on 1-GlyRs. MethodsUsing 2-electrode voltage-clamp electrophysiology in oocytes expressing either 2- or 3-GlyRs, we first tested the hypothesis that the effects of EtOH on 2- and 3-GlyRs would be zinc dependent, as we have previously reported for 1-GlyRs. Next, we constructed an 3P185L-mutant GlyR to test whether RNA-edited and unedited GlyRs contain differences in EtOH sensitivity. Last, we built a homology model of the 3-GlyR subunit. ResultsThe effects of EtOH (20 to 200mM) on both subunits were greater in the presence than in the absence of 500nM added zinc. The 3P185L-mutation that corresponds to RNA editing increased sensitivity to glycine and decreased sensitivity to EtOH. ConclusionsOur findings provide further evidence that zinc is important for determining the magnitude of EtOH's effects at GlyRs and suggest that by better understanding zinc/EtOH interactions at GlyRs, we may better understand the sites and mechanisms of EtOH action.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据