4.2 Article

Promoting Behavior Change from Alcohol Use Through Mobile Technology: The Future of Ecological Momentary Assessment

期刊

ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 35, 期 12, 页码 2209-2215

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01571.x

关键词

Ecological Momentary Assessment; Alcohol; Intervention; Cellular Phones; Behavior Change; Cell Phones

资金

  1. NIAAA [T32 AA07569]
  2. NIDA [P30-028807]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Interactive and mobile technologies (i.e., smartphones such as Blackberries, iPhones, and palm-top computers) show promise as an efficacious and cost-effective means of communicating health-behavior risks, improving public health outcomes, and accelerating behavior change. The present study was conducted as a needs assessment to examine the current available mobile smartphone applications (e.g., apps) that utilize principles of ecological momentary assessment (EMA)daily self-monitoring or near real-time self-assessment of alcohol-use behaviorto promote positive behavior change, alcohol harm reduction, psycho-education about alcohol use, or abstinence from alcohol. Methods: Data were collected and analyzed from iTunes for Apple iPhone (c). An inventory assessed the number of available apps that directly addressed alcohol use and consumption, alcohol treatment, or recovery, and whether these apps incorporated empirically based components of alcohol treatment. Results: Findings showed that few apps addressed alcohol-use behavior change or recovery. Aside from tracking drinking consumption, a minority utilized empirically based components of alcohol treatment. Some apps claimed they could serve as an intervention; however, no empirical evidence was provided. Conclusions: More studies are needed to examine the efficacy of mobile technology in alcohol intervention studies. The large gap between availability of mobile apps and their use in alcohol treatment programs indicates several important future directions for research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据