4.5 Article

High-Bandwidth Pulsed Microactuators for High-Speed Flow Control

期刊

AIAA JOURNAL
卷 48, 期 10, 页码 2386-2396

出版社

AMER INST AERONAUT ASTRONAUT
DOI: 10.2514/1.J050405

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ronda Center foi Advanced Aero-Propulsion
  2. U S Air Force Office of Scientific Research
  3. Office Of The Director
  4. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering [0968313] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A systematic study on the design. development, and characterization of high-nunnentum, high-bandwidth microactuators for high-speed flow control is described in this paper. Beginning with building-block experiments. multiple resonant flow phenomena are used in the actuator design to arrive at an actuator configuration that provides the desired flow properties. The first-generation actuator design consists of an underexpanded source jet incident upon a cavity. The lower surface of this cavity contains micronozzles through which the unsteady nucrojets (400 p.m) issue. Results show that microjets produced by this actuator have a high mean momentum (300-400 m/s) and a significant unsteady component (20-30% of the mean). Experiments were conducted over a large range of parameters in terms of cavity length, source jet nozzle pressure ratio, and impingement distance. The results unequivocally demonstrate the ability to vary the frequency and the amplitude Mille mean and unsteady momentum of microjets issuing from this actuator. By varying the dimensions of the actuator by kw hundred microns and/or source jet pressure by roughly 1 atm. one is able to vary the frequency rather precisely over a range of 5-20 kl lz. A correlation based on Strouhal number and jet col length is suggested for the design of actuators. Actuators in the frequency range of a few to well over 50 kHz have been designed and characterized. It is believed that the frequency range may be extended down to 0(100 Hz) and up to -49(100 k z) using this actuator approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据