4.5 Article

Compressibility Effects on Boundary-Layer Transition Induced by an Isolated Roughness Element

期刊

AIAA JOURNAL
卷 48, 期 12, 页码 2818-2830

出版社

AMER INST AERONAUT ASTRONAUT
DOI: 10.2514/1.J050186

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union [AST5-CT-2006-030729]
  2. United Kingdom Applied Aerodynamics Consortium [EP/F005954/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/G069581/1, EP/F011016/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G069581/1, EP/F011016/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Direct numerical simulation has been used to study the transition to turbulence of a high-speed boundary layer over a flat plate with an isolated roughness element The roughness element consists of a continuous bump that is approximately half the boundary layer thickness in height. Simulations at Mach 3 and Mach 6 have been run over a range of Reynolds numbers for two fixed wall temperatures corresponding to either an adiabatic or a cooled wall condition In each case a lift-up of low momentum fluid away from the wall is observed leading to the formation of a detached shear layer Acoustic disturbances are imposed to stimulate the instability of this layer and breakdown to turbulence is observed in the simulations at the highest Reynolds number in all cases except for the Mach 6 cold wall condition The magnitude of the streamwise vorticity behind the roughness element increases with roughness height Reynolds number and is relatively insensitive to Mach number and wall temperature Strouhal numbers associated with hairpin vortex formation are generally lower than in incompressible flow The critical roughness height Reynolds number for transition within the computational domain is found to increase as the Mach number increases and is higher for the cooled wall condition A correlation based on roughness height Reynolds and Mach numbers and wall temperature is found to separate laminar from transitional cases for the range of flow conditions studied

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据