4.7 Article

Sheepfolds as hotspots of nitric oxide (NO) emission in an Inner Mongolian steppe

期刊

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
卷 134, 期 1-2, 页码 136-142

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.06.007

关键词

Nitric oxide; Sheepfold; Faeces; Emission factor; Inner Mongolia; Grasslands

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40805061, 40425010]
  2. German Research Foundation [1173/6-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated nitric oxide (NO) fluxes at a summer and a winter sheepfold in the Baiyinxile livestock farm, near Xilinhot, Inner Mongolia, which are a typical feature of the regional husbandry. Using a manual static opaque chamber/chemiluminescence measuring system, we intermittently observed fluxes in the summer sheepfold between May 28th and September 26th 2005 and in both winter and summer sheepfolds between March 8th and October 18th 2006. During these periods, mean NO emissions (+/- S.E., in terms of mass of nitrogen) were 124.0 +/- 28.7, 134.6 +/- 23.3 (summer sheepfold) and 214.4 +/- 79.6 mu g NO-N m(-2) h(-1) (winter sheepfold), respectively, and thus, three magnitudes higher than observed steppe NO emissions in the same region. The NO fluxes were not significantly different between the 2 years, but in summer they were much higher than in spring (p < 0.05). Temperature and moisture of the faeces layer significantly regulated the NO fluxes (p < 0.01). The direct NO emission factor (EF) for faeces and urine excreted in the sheepfolds was 0.7 g NO-N-emitted kg(-1) N-excreted, which was almost 37 times lower than a recently reported N2O EF. We estimated the total No emission from the sheepfolds of the Baiyinxile livestock farm to be 1.82 +/- 0.43 tons NO-N year(-1), which accounts to approximately 12.3% of the total NO emission from this steppe region. With the rapid increase of livestock numbers, sheepfold NO emissions may further increase and contribute to high N deposition in confined areas around sheepfolds. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据