4.7 Article

Effects of permanent ground cover on soil moisture in jujube orchards under sloping ground: A simulation study

期刊

AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 68-77

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.03.002

关键词

Simulated rain; Ground cover; Jujube tree; Soil moisture; Runoff and sediment

资金

  1. Special Foundation of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [31172039]
  2. National Science & Technology Supporting Plan [2011BAD29B09]
  3. Ministry of Education
  4. State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs [B12007]
  5. Supporting Project of Young Technology Nova of Shaanxi Province [2010KJXX-04]
  6. Supporting Plan of Young Elites
  7. NWAFU Research Project [2013RWYB20]
  8. Northwest AF University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simulated study including 6 soil management treatments was conducted in 2011 and 2012 to evaluate impacts of ground cover on soil moisture and slope runoff in a pear-jujube (Ziziphus jujube Mill.) orchard. Treatments were (1) strip cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L) cover (SCF), (2) strip crown vetch (Coronilla varia L) cover (SCV), (3) strip birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L) cover (SBF), (4) strip white clover (Trifolium repens L.) cover (SWC), (5) full white clover cover (WCC) and (6) control (clean cultivation) (CC). Results showed that, the 2-year mean infiltration water amount after rain was significantly higher under vegetation cover treatments than under CC (P < 0.05), and significantly greater under WCC than under strip vegetation cover treatments (P < 0.05, except for SCF). The runoff volume and sediment yield were significantly larger under CC than under other treatments (P < 0.05). The daily water consumption under WCC and CC was larger than other treatments. The mean soil moisture was significantly higher under SCF than under others (P < 0.05). Significant differences were found between the grass and legume covers (P < 0.05). The cocksfoot was considered as the best choice as a ground cover in pear-jujube orchards on dry slopes. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据