4.7 Article

Seasonal differences in the CO2 exchange of a short-hydroperiod Florida Everglades marsh

期刊

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
卷 150, 期 7-8, 页码 994-1006

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.03.005

关键词

Ecosystem respiration; Eddy covariance; Gross ecosystem production; Net ecosystem production; Short-hydroperiod marsh; Wetland

资金

  1. Department of Energy's National Institute for Climate Change Research [07-SC-NICCR-1059]
  2. National Science Foundation [DBI-0620409, DEB-9910514]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although wetlands are among the world's most productive ecosystems, little is known of long-term CO2 exchange in tropical and subtropical wetlands. The Everglades is a highly managed wetlands complex occupying >6000 km(2) in south Florida. This ecosystem is oligotrophic, but extremely high rates of productivity have been previously reported. To evaluate CO2 exchange and its response to seasonality (dry vs. wet season) in the Everglades, an eddy covariance tower was established in a short-hydroperiod marl marsh. Rates of net ecosystem exchange and ecosystem respiration were small year-round and declined in the wet season relative to the dry season. Inundation reduced macrophyte CO2 uptake, substantially limiting gross ecosystem production. While light and air temperature exerted the primary controls on net ecosystem exchange and ecosystem respiration in the dry season, inundation weakened these relationships. The ecosystem shifted from a CO2 sink in the dry season to a CO2 source in the wet season; however, the marsh was a small carbon sink on an annual basis. Net ecosystem production, ecosystem respiration, and gross ecosystem production were -49.9, 446.1 and 496.0 g C m(-2) year(-1), respectively. Unexpectedly low CO2 flux rates and annual production distinguish the Everglades from many other wetlands. Nonetheless, impending changes in water management are likely to alter the CO2 balance of this wetland and may increase the source strength of these extensive short-hydroperiod wetlands. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据