4.3 Article

Phloem phytochemistry and aphid responses to elevated CO2, nitrogen fertilization and endophyte infection

期刊

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST ENTOMOLOGY
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 273-283

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/afe.12055

关键词

Amino acids; bird cherry-oat aphid; elevated CO2; Neotyphodium coenophialum; phloem sap; Rhopalosiphum padi; Schedonorus arundinaceus; tall fescue

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  2. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
  3. NSERC-CGS scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1 Rising atmospheric CO2 has been shown to alter plant nitrogen metabolism, growth and secondary chemistry. We hypothesized that altered aphid performance under elevated CO2 is linked to phloem nitrogen chemistry. 2 Rhopalosiphum padi performance on endophyte-infected or uninfected tall fescue was examined under three levels of CO2 (ambient, 800 and 1000 p.p.m.) and high and low nitrogen fertilization. Ethylenediaminetetracetic acid-facilitated exudation was used to sample phloem sap, followed by quantification of relative amino acid concentrations using reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. 3 Aphid abundance was reduced at 800 p.p.m. relative to ambient CO2 but returned to baseline at 1000 p.p.m. The density of aphids was reduced in both the elevated CO2 treatments. Aphids were unsuccessful at colonizing endophyte-infected plants, possibly as a result of the presence of loline alkaloids. 4 Multivariate analysis showed that certain groups of phloem amino acids were altered by nitrogen fertilization and CO2. We found that four amino acids (valine, arginine, glutamine and aspartate) were correlated with aphid performance. These findings partially explained the effect of plant nitrogen fertilization and elevated CO2 on aphids. 5 The present study represents a first step toward providing a mechanistic explanation of the aphid performance changes that may result from rising atmospheric CO2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据