4.5 Article

Quality of life in dementia care - differences in quality of life measurements performed by residents with dementia and by nursing staff

期刊

AGING & MENTAL HEALTH
卷 16, 期 7, 页码 819-827

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2012.667782

关键词

dementia; quality of life; self-ratings; staff-ratings

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
  2. Robert Bosch Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Quality of life (QoL) is a major outcome parameter in dementia care. Self-ratings are considered the best way to evaluate QoL, but staff-ratings also provide valid results. In particular, the discrepancies between self-ratings and staff-ratings are underrepresented. The aim was to identify characteristics of people with dementia that improve the probability of completing a self rating QoL instrument on the 'Quality of Life Alzheimers' Disease' (QoL-AD). Additionally, a level of agreement was set between self-rated and staff-rated QoL-AD and possible influencing factors. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2010 in Berlin. Using the instrument QoL-AD, the self-and staff-rated QoL of people with dementia was assessed. Results: 104 residents (73.1% female, mean age: 79.0 years, mean cognitive function (MMSE): 11.5) were included in this research project. 49 (47.1%) residents were able to complete the QoL-AD questionnaire. A predictor to complete the QoL-AD was the MMSE-part 'language'. Residents rated their QoL as significantly higher than the nursing staff did. If the primary nurse rated the QoL, a significantly better agreement was identified. Conclusion: The study generated new findings concerning a better understanding of QoL measurements. The results suggest the usefulness of performing self-ratings whenever possible. If proxy-ratings have to be used, these should be performed by primary nurses only in order to get reliable results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据