4.0 Article

Impact of the AGTR1 A1166C polymorphism on subcortical hyperintensities and cognition in healthy older adults

期刊

AGE
卷 36, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11357-014-9664-x

关键词

AGTR1; A1166C; Cerebrovascular aging; Subcortical hyperintensities; Cognition

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) [R01 NS052470, R01 NS039538]
  2. NIH/National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) [R21 MH090494]
  3. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [1037196]
  4. NHMRC [401184]
  5. NIH/National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) [UL1 TR000448]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vascular aging consists of complex and multifaceted processes that may be influenced by genetic polymorphisms of the renin-angiotensin system. A polymorphism in the angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene (AGTR1/rs5186) has been associated with an increased risk for arterial stiffness, hypertension, and ischemic stroke. Despite these identified relationships, the impact of AGTR1 A1166C on white matter integrity and cognition is less clear in a healthy aging population. The present study utilized indices of neuroimaging and neuropsychological assessment to examine the impact of the A1166C polymorphism on subcortical hyperintensities (SH) and cognition in 49 healthy adults between ages 51-85. Using a dominant statistical model (CC + CA (risk) vs. AA), results revealed significantly larger SH volume for individuals with the C1166 variant (p<0.05, partial eta(2) = 0.117) compared with those with the AA genotype. Post hoc analyses indicated that increased SH volume in C allele carriers could not be explained by vascular factors such as pulse pressure or body mass index. In addition, cognitive performance did not differ significantly between groups and was not significantly associated with SH in this cohort. Results suggest that presence of the C1166 variant may serve as a biomarker of risk for suboptimal brain integrity in otherwise healthy older adults prior to changes in cognition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据