4.6 Article

Multi-scale statistical signal processing of cutting force in cutting tool condition monitoring

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-7116-0

关键词

WHMT; Tool wear condition monitoring; Cutting force; Signal processing

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Programof China (863 Program) [2013AA041107]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a machining system, accurate tool wear condition monitoring is paramount for guaranteeing the quality of the workpiece and tool life. The cutting force signal has been proved to be the most sensitive signal to depict the tool wear variation during the machining process. This paper introduces a data-driven modeling framework for tool wear monitoring in a machining process, which is based on statistical processing of cutting force wavelet transform by a hidden Markov tree. As a kind of data-driven prognostic approach, this method exploits the tool wear states feature from a deeply data mining perspective while the Markov dependence of wavelet transformation at different frequencies or scales is captured. With lathe turning as the research object, a detailed study on the statistical analysis of cutting force in different tool conditions is presented. A two phases monitoring process that assesses the tool wear conditions from generated model by using the statistical features of cutting force wavelet transform is built. Compared to the traditional classifiers, which usually have a difficult condition in distinguishing tool wear states when given a limited amount of samples, the proposed approach make more efficient use of the training data with high sensitivity to the tool wear conditions. Experimental studies of Inconel 718 cutting show that this approach is robust and makes the cutting force information exploited effectively in data mining. Based on the experimental results, the proposed method for tool condition monitoring outperforms the traditional used Hidden Markov model and Gaussian mixture model approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据