4.5 Article

Structural Property Effect of Nanoparticle Agglomerates on Particle Penetration through Fibrous Filter

期刊

AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 43, 期 4, 页码 344-355

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/02786820802653763

关键词

-

资金

  1. Center for Filtration Research: 3M Corporation, Cummins Filtration Inc.
  2. Donaldson Company, Inc.
  3. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
  4. Samsung Semiconductor Inc.
  5. Shigematsu Works CO., LTD
  6. TSI Inc.
  7. W. L. Gore Associates
  8. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most filtration studies have been conducted with spherical particles; however, many aerosol particles are agglomerates of small primary spheres. Filtration efficiency tests were conducted with silver NP agglomerates, with the agglomerate structure controlled by altering the temperature of a sintering furnace. The mobility diameter and mass of the silver NP agglomerates were measured using a differential mobility analyzer together with an aerosol particle mass analyzer. From these measurements, it was found that the fractal-like dimension, Dfm, varied from 2.07 to 2.95 as the sintering temperatures was increased from ambient to 600C. The agglomerates were essentially fully coalesced at 600C allowing direct comparison of the filtration behavior of the agglomerate to that of a sphere with the same mobility diameter. Other agglomerate properties measured include the primary diameter, the agglomerate length and aspect ratio, and the dynamic shape factor. Agglomerate filtration modeling with no adjustable parameters has been investigated in terms of diffusion, impaction, and interception. The model results agree qualitatively with the experimental results in the particle size range of 50 to 300 nm. The results indicated that the larger interception length of agglomerates is responsible for the smaller penetration through a fibrous filter in comparison to spherical particles with the same mobility diameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据