4.6 Article

Contributions of the French Institut Geographique National (IGN) to the International DORIS Service

期刊

ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 12, 页码 1470-1480

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2009.09.019

关键词

DORIS; Geodesy; Geophysics; Analysis center; Global data center

资金

  1. Centre National d'Etudes Spatial (CNES) in France

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DOR IS is one of the four geodetic space techniques participating to the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS). Since the early development of this system, the Institut Geographique National played a specific and active role. Within, the International DORIS Service (IDS), IGN is in a particular position. While it is responsible for the installation and the maintenance of the DORIS ground tracking stations, it also handles one of the two IDS data center delivering DORIS data and products and has been an IDS Analysis Center for years, providing all possible IDS products, in particular the latest ignwd08 time series in preparation of ITRF2008. This paper explains the different aspects of the IGN contribution to IDS from an historical point of view, presents current activities and scientific results and provides a perspective for future activities. Recent DOR IS results show a 10 mm precision or better when more than four DORIS satellites are available. Comparisons between recent DORIS solutions (ign07d02 and ign09d02) and past ITRF realizations show that errors are shared between the DORIS and the ITRF realizations. Some problems related to DORIS data processing are also discussed and possible ways to solve them in the future are discussed. In particular, we can now reject the tropospheric origin of the problem detected in the Envisat data after the software upload of October 12, 2004. A few applications in geodesy (terrestrial reference frame, Earth's polar motion) and geophysics are also discussed as a natural extension of these service-type activities. (C) 2009 COSPA R. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据