4.5 Review

Towards effective evaluation and reform in medical education: a cognitive and learning sciences perspective

期刊

ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 791-812

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10459-007-9091-1

关键词

Medical education; Evaluation; Assessment; Clinical competence; Cognitive science; Learning science

资金

  1. College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Phoenix
  2. Arizona State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Health professions education is dealing with major transformations in light of the changing nature of the health care delivery system, including the use of technology for just in time delivery of care, evidence-based practice, personalized medical care and learning, as health professionals strive to integrate biomedical advances and clinical practice. This has forced the medical education community to reassess the current teaching and learning practices and more importantly, the evaluation of the medical education process. There have been recent advances in cognitive and learning sciences theories, some of which can inform medical educators about best teaching and learning practices and their impact on the evaluation process. An understanding of these theories provides a sound rationale for choosing specific instructional strategies and choosing evaluation measures that assess the curricular objectives. The review begins with an overview of evaluation and assessment in education, followed by an overview of major theories from the cognitive and learning sciences. Next, the role of cognitive and learning sciences theories in informing the process of medical education evaluation is discussed, including its impact on student learning, performance and professional competence, as well as recommendations for reform of medical curricula based on such theories. The paper continues with the elaboration of current trends in health sciences education, particularly medical education, and available evidence for the impact on student learning and performance as well as areas where more research is needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据