4.7 Article

Haptic assisted aircraft optimal assembly path planning scheme based on swarming and artificial potential field approach

期刊

ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE
卷 69, 期 -, 页码 18-25

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.003

关键词

Virtual reality; Assembly automation; Particle swarm optimization; Ant colony optimization; Path planning; Path optimization

资金

  1. National Research Foundation Korea (NRF) [2011-00313832010-0029690, 20120009524, 2012R1A2A2A01047344]
  2. Regional SW Convergence Support Project of NIPA
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A2A2A01047344] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this research, a novel near optimum automated rigid aircraft engine parts assembly path planning algorithm based on particle swarm optimization approach is proposed to solve the obstacle free assembly path planning process in a 3d haptic assisted environment. 3d path planning using valid assembly sequence information was optimized by combining particle swarm optimization algorithm enhanced by the potential field path planning concepts. Furthermore, the presented approach was compared with traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO), ant colony optimization algorithm (ACO) and genetic algorithm (CGA). Simulation results showed that the proposed algorithm has faster convergence rate towards the optimal solution and less computation time when compared with existing algorithms based on genetics and ant colony approach. To confirm the optimality of the proposed algorithm, it was further experimented in a haptic guided environment, where the users were assisted with haptic active guidance feature to perform the process opting the optimized assembly path. It was observed that the haptic guidance feature further reduced the overall task completion time. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据