期刊
ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE
卷 75, 期 -, 页码 1-13出版社
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.04.005
关键词
Meta-heuristics comparative performance; Truss minimisation; Dynamic constraints; Evolutionary algorithms; Shap and sizing optimisation; Penalty function techniques
类别
资金
- Thailand Research Fund (TRF) [BRG5580017]
This paper investigates the search performances of various meta-heuristics (MHs) for solving truss mass minimisation with dynamic constraints. Several established MHs were used to solve five truss optimisation problems. The results obtained from using the various MHs were statistically compared based upon convergence rate and consistency. It was found that the best optimisers for this design task are evolution strategy with covariance matrix adaptation (CMAES) and differential evolution (DE). Furthermore, the best penalty function technique was discovered while four penalty function techniques assigned with several parameter settings were used in combination with the five best optimisers to solve the truss optimisation problems. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据