4.7 Article

Enzymatic Synthesis of α-Glucosides of Resveratrol with Surfactant Activity

期刊

ADVANCED SYNTHESIS & CATALYSIS
卷 353, 期 7, 页码 1077-1086

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adsc.201000968

关键词

antioxidants; cyclodextrin glucanotransferases (CGTases); glycosylation; piceid; resveratrol; surfactants

资金

  1. Comunidad de Madrid
  2. CSIC [200680F0132]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [BIO2007-67708-C04-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the synthesis of a series of alpha-glucosyl derivatives of resveratrol (3,5,4'-trihydroxy-stilbene) by a transglycosylation reaction catalyzed by the enzyme cyclodextrin glucanotransferase (CGTase) using starch as glucosyl donor. Several reaction parameters (temperature, solvent composition, enzyme concentration and starch/resveratrol ratio) were optimized. The yield of alpha-glucosylated products reached 50% in 24 h. The structures of the derivatives were determined by a combination of amyloglucosidase-hydrolysis tests, MS and 2D-NMR. Three families of products were obtained: glucosylated at 3-OH, at 4'-OH and at both 3-OH and 4'-OH. The bonds between glucoses were basically alpha(1 -> 4). Interestingly, the water solubilities of the alpha-glucosylated derivatives were at least 65- and 5-fold higher than those of resveratrol and the natural beta-glucosylated derivative (piceid), respectively. In contrast with piceid, the synthesized alpha-glucosylated compounds exhibited surfactant activity, with critical micelle concentration (CMC) values in the range 0.5-3.6 mM. Although the incorporation of a glucosyl moiety caused a loss of antioxidant activity (more pronounced in the position 3-OH compared with 4'-OH), the fact that the glycosides need to be converted into the aglycones before they are absorbed minimizes such an effect. In contrast, the modification of physicochemical properties such as solubility and partition coefficient by glycosylation could exert a positive influence on the bioavailability of resveratrol.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据