4.7 Article

Polymer Cocktail: A Multitask Supported Ionic Liquid-Like Species to Facilitate Multiple and Consecutive C-C Coupling Reactions

期刊

ADVANCED SYNTHESIS & CATALYSIS
卷 352, 期 17, 页码 3013-3021

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adsc.201000528

关键词

C-C coupling reactions; green chemistry; ionic liquids; polymer-supported reagents and catalysts; supported catalysts; supported ionic liquids

资金

  1. Spanish MICINN
  2. Feder funds [CTQ2008-04412/BQU]
  3. CSIC [2009-80I092]
  4. Generalitat Valenciana [ACOMP/2010/280]
  5. Bancaixa-UJI [P1 1A2007-11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polymer-supported ionic liquid-like species (SILLPs) with different functionalities have been combined to obtain new catalytic systems (polymer cocktail) with improved properties towards their application for C-C coupling reactions. The SILLPs have been synthesized in a simple way and combined to play different functions in the reaction medium. Those roles involve simultaneously (or consecutively) their actuation as supported reagents, precatalysts and scavengers of undesired reaction side-products. The system has been tested by employing three different C-C coupling reactions for 8 consecutive cycles. Moreover, different aryl bromides and iodides have proved to be efficiently transformed by the catalytic cocktail. Finally, the Heck reaction has been conducted in continuous-flow conditions using a packed bed of this polymer cocktail and employing supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO(2)) as a solvent, which cannot be carried out with the use of soluble bases as this would lead to the clogging of the reactor. Finally, the SILLPs cocktail enables one to combine different reaction steps and purification in a single vessel, which represents a significant improvement in terms of process intensification and green chemistry. This is particularly true in the case of the use of scCO(2) as this allows the direct production of crude materials not contaminated either by salts or by solvents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据