4.7 Article

Diffusion kinetics, mechanical properties, and crystallographic characterization of intermetallic compounds in the Mg-Zn binary system

期刊

INTERMETALLICS
卷 67, 期 -, 页码 145-155

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2015.08.001

关键词

Crystal chemistry; Diffusion; Mechanical properties; Alloy design; Heat treatment; Phase transformations

资金

  1. U.S. Army Research Laboratory [W911NF1120020]
  2. Florida International University Graduate School

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pure Mg was diffusion bonded to pure Zn at 315 degrees C for 168 h to produce equilibrium intermetallic compounds of the Mg-Zn system. All equilibrium phases at 315 degrees C, Mg21Zn25, Mg4Zn7, MgZn2, Mg2Zn11, were observed to develop. Concentration profiles by electron probe microanalysis, electron diffraction patterns by transmission electron microscopy, and load-displacement curves by nano-indentation were examined to characterize the phase constituents, crystal structure, diffusion kinetics, and mechanical properties. Mg21Zn25 with trigonal, Mg4Zn7 with monoclinic, and Mg2Zn11 with cubic structures were found and their lattice parameters were reported herein. Mg4Zn7 and Mg2Zn11 were observed to have a range of solubility of approximately 2.4 at% and 1.6 at%, respectively. Interdiffusion in MgZn2 occurred most rapidly, was an order of magnitude slower in Mg4Zn7 and Mg2Zn11, and was the slowest in Mg21Zn25. Composition-dependence of interdiffusion within each intermetallic phase was negligible. The intermetallic phases exhibited insignificant creep, but evidence of discontinuous yielding was observed. The average hardness and reduced moduli were similar for Mg21Zn25, Mg4Zn7, and MgZn2 phases, similar to 5 GPa and similar to 90 GPa, respectively. However, the Mg2Zn11 phase had lower hardness of 3.76 GPa and higher modulus of 108.9 GPa. The mechanical properties in the characterized intermetallic phases, exclusive of Mg21Zn25, were strongly concentration-dependent. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据