4.8 Article

Synergistic Computational-Experimental Approach to Improve Ionene Polymer-Based Functional Hydrogels

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 24, 期 31, 页码 4893-4904

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201304230

关键词

-

资金

  1. Universitat Regensburg (Anschubfinanzierung von Wissenschaftlichen Projekten)
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion - FEDER [CTQ2010-17436, MAT2012-34498]
  3. Gobierno de Aragon - FSE (research group E40)
  4. DIUE of the Generalitat de Catalunya [2009SGR 925, XRQTC]
  5. Generalitat de Catalunya
  6. DFG

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The manifold applications of ionene-based materials such as hydrogels in daily life, biomedical sciences, and industrial processes are a consequence of their unique physical and chemical properties, which are governed by a judicious balance between multiple non-covalent interactions. However, one of the most critical aspects identified for a broader use of different polyelectrolytes is the need of raising their gelation efficiency. This work focuses on surfactant-free ionene polymers 1-3 containing DABCO and N, N'-(x-phenylene)dibenzamide (x = ortho-/meta-/para-) linkages as model systems to develop a combined computational-experimental approach to improve the hydrogelation through a better understanding of the gelation mechanism. Molecular dynamics simulations of isomeric ionenes 1-3 with explicit water molecules point out remarkable differences in the assembly of the polymeric chains in each case. Interchain regions with high degree of hydration (i.e., polymer water interactions) and zones dominated by polymer polymer interactions are evident in the case of ortho-(1) and meta -(2) isomeric ionenes, whereas domains controlled by polymer polymer interactions are practically inexistent in 3. In excellent agreement, ortho-ionene 1 provides experimentally the best hydrogels with unique features such as thixotropic behavior and dispersion ability for single-walles carbon nanotubes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据