期刊
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS
卷 33, 期 2, 页码 225-234出版社
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.09.001
关键词
college drinking; binge; drinking consequences
Despite its ubiquity, the term Binge drinking has been controversial. Among other things, the grouping of drinkers into a single risk category based on a relatively low threshold may not capture adequately the nature of problem drinking behaviors. The present study is an initial examination of the utility of delineating heavy drinkers into three groups; those who typically drink below the traditional Binge cutoff (less than 4+/5+ drinks per occasion for women/men), those who met traditional Binge drinking criteria, and a higher Binge cutoff of 6+/7+ (women, men). We examined differences in drunkenness, drinking frequency, and unique types of alcohol problems. Participants (N=356; 184 women) were regularly drinking college students at a mid-sized U.S. university who completed a battery of self-report measures including a calendar of daily alcohol consumption, and the 8-domain Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (YAACQ). Estimated Blood Alcohol Levels (eBALs) were calculated. We found that the standard 4+/5+ drink Binge cutoff distinguishes drinkers across some but not all indices of alcohol involvement. Binge drinkers differed from their Non-Binge counterparts on eBAL, but for other indicators (drinking frequency, total alcohol consequences), only Heavy Binge drinkers differed significantly from Non-Binge drinkers. Importantly, Heavy Binge drinkers experienced higher levels of those specific consequences associated with more problematic alcohol involvement. Findings suggest that not all Binge drinkers drink alike, are equally drunk, or experience similar consequences. As such, there may be utility in distinguishing among heavy drinkers, in order to focus appropriately on those at greatest risk for different types of consequences. (C) 2007 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据