4.1 Review

The early development of the echidna, Tachyglossus aculeatus (Mammalia: Monotremata), and patterns of mammalian development

期刊

ACTA ZOOLOGICA
卷 92, 期 1, 页码 75-88

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-6395.2009.00447.x

关键词

organogenesis; embryology; staging system; heterochrony; Theria; limb

资金

  1. Swiss National Fund [3100A0-116013]
  2. Forschungskredit of the University of Zurich [3772]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Werneburg, I. and Sanchez-Villagra, M.R. 2011. The early development of the echidna, Tachyglossus aculeatus (Mammalia: Monotremata), and patterns of mammalian development. - Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 92: 75-88. The echidna is one of the last survivors of the most basal clade of living mammals and as such, it is an important species to understand character transformation in the dawn of mammalian evolution. Based on description of several embryological stages and consideration of characters taken from the classical drawings of Richard Semon (1859-1918), we study the early development of this species using the Standard Event System. We describe and analyse developmental timing with a phylogenetic approach (Parsimov). A mosaic of plesiomorphic and derived features - reportedly found in the echidna adult anatomy and genome, when compared to other living mammals - is also found when examining its embryonic development. In contrast to sauropsids, we found mammals to be characterized by late eye and ear development, possibly related to their contrasting early postnatal life history. The differentiation of the jaw bones may be reflected in the developmental timing of the mandibular process among mammals. Whereas in therians the mandibular process shows an accelerated development, in echidna a delayed timing of mandibular process characters is observable. We highlight the limitation of interpreting heterochronic data and expose the plasticity in the timing of developmental characters, examined under alternative phylogenetic frameworks and character definitions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据