4.7 Article

γ-Secretase inhibitor DAPT sensitizes t-AUCB-induced apoptosis of human glioblastoma cells in vitro via blocking the p38 MAPK/MAPKAPK2/Hsp27 pathway

期刊

ACTA PHARMACOLOGICA SINICA
卷 35, 期 6, 页码 825-831

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/aps.2013.195

关键词

glioma; chemotherapy; gamma-secretase; DAPT; soluble epoxide hydrolase; t-AUCB; apoptosis; caspase-3; p38 MAPK; MAPKAPK2; Hsp27

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81070974, 81301905]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Trans-444-(3-adamantan-1-yl-ureido)-cyalohexyloxy]-benzoic acid (t-AUCB) is a soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitor that suppresses glioblastoma cell growth in vitro. The aim of this study was to examine whether the y-secretase inhibitor ARN-(3,5-difluorophenacety1)-1alanyl]-S-phenylglycine t-butyl ester (DAPT) could sensitize glioma cells to t-AUCB-induced apoptosis. Methods: Both U251 and U87 human glioblastoma cell lines were tested. Cell growth was assessed using the cell counting kit-8. Cell apoptosis was detected with caspase-3 activity assay kits and flow cytometry. The protein levels in the p38 MAPK/MAPKAPK2/Hsp27 pathway in the cells were analyzed using Western blots. Results: Pretreatment with DAPT (2 mu mol/L) substantially potentiated the growth inhibition caused by t-AUCB (200 pmol/L) in U251 and U87 cells. Furthermore, pretreatment with DAPT markedly increased t-AUCB-induced apoptosis of U251 and U87 cells. T-AUCB alone did not significant affect caspase-3 activity in the cells, but t-AUCB plus DAPT pretreatment caused significant increase of caspase-3 actiyity. Furthermore, pretreatment with DAPT completely blocked t-AUCB-induced phosphorylation of p38 MAPK, MAPKAPK2 and Hsp27 in the cells. Conclusion: The y-secretase inhibitor DAPT sensitizes t-AUCB-induced apoptosis of human glioblastoma cells in vitro via blocking the p38 MAPK/MAPKAPK2/Hsp27 pathway, suggesting that the combination of t-AUCB and DAPT may be a potentially effective strategy for the treatment of glioblastoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据