4.4 Review

System review and meta-analysis on photodynamic therapy in central serous chorioretinopathy

期刊

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA
卷 92, 期 8, 页码 e594-e601

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aos.12482

关键词

central serous chorioretinopathy; meta-analysis; photodynamic therapy; system review; verteporfin

资金

  1. Natural Science foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2013HZ003]
  2. Scientific & Technologic Project of Jinan [201302025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeTo evaluate the effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) on central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) compared with laser therapy and intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs, and to find the maximum treatment effect with minimal dose and fluence of PDT. MethodsA systematic electronic search was conducted in Feb 2013 in PubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge and the Cochrane library. The main outcome factors were compared in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) and resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF). Meta-analysis was performed when it is appropriate. The comparisons were designed into four groups: group 1, PDT versus laser photocoagulation; group 2, PDT versus intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF drugs; group 3, half-dose verteporfin PDT versus placebo; group 4, half-fluence PDT versus full-fluence PDT. ResultsWe retrieved nine reports of studies including a total of 319 patients. In group 1, the summary result indicated that PDT was superior in resolution of SRF (p=0.005) than laser photocoagulation. In group 2, PDT could resolute SRF (p=0.007) and decrease CMT (p=0.002) more rapidly than intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF drugs. In group 3, half-dose PDT was effective in improving BCVA (p<0.00001), decreasing CMT (p=0.001) and resolving SRF (p<0.001). In group 4, half-fluence PDT was effective and could significantly decrease the hypoxic damage which was caused by PDT (p<0.001). ConclusionPDT is a promising therapy for CSC patients and the parameters of PDT can be adjusted to obtain the maximum treatment effect with minimal adverse effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据