4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Evaluation of vitreous levels of gatifloxacin after systemic administration in inflamed and non-inflamed eyes

期刊

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA
卷 87, 期 6, 页码 648-652

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01323.x

关键词

endophthalmitis; gatifloxacin; intravitreal penetration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the human vitreous penetration of gatifloxacin in inflamed and non-inflamed eyes after oral administration. Methods: Vitreous penetration of single-dose (400 mg) oral gatifloxacin was evaluated in patients (n = 33) undergoing vitreous tap during the standard procedure for intravitreal antibiotic injection for acute postoperative endophthalmitis at various time-points. Vitreous penetration of 400 mg oral gatifloxacin was evaluated in the non-inflamed eyes of patients (n = 33) undergoing pars plana vitrectomy at similar time-points. The study was extended to evaluate the vitreous penetration of single-dose oral (800 mg) gatifloxacin at a single time-point in inflamed (n = 10) and non-inflamed (n = 11) eyes. Results: After 400 mg oral gatifloxacin, inflamed eyes showed mean vitreous concentrations of 0.58 +/- 0.19 mu g/ml, 1.33 +/- 0.33 mu g/ml and 1.30 +/- 0.23 mu g/ml at 2, 4 and 6 hours, respectively. The levels reached at 2 and 4 hours were found to be significantly increased compared with those in non-inflamed eyes. At the 800-mg dose, 4-hour vitreous levels in inflamed and non-inflamed eyes were 1.57 +/- 0.3 mu g/ml and 1.42 +/- 0.24 mu g/ml, respectively. Although the increased dose of gatifloxacin elevated plasma concentration, it failed to raise vitreous levels significantly higher than the 400-mg dose at the 4-hour time-point. Conclusions: Orally administered gatifloxacin achieves therapeutic levels in both inflamed and non-inflamed human eyes with a spectrum covering the bacterial species most frequently involved in the various causes of endophthalmitis. However, the levels achieved were below the MIC90 for Pseudomonas aureginosa and Enterococcus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据