4.3 Article

Within-population variability influences early seedling establishment in four Mediterranean oaks

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2012.04.008

关键词

Aboveground biomass; Emergence; Growth; Mother plant; Seed; Survival

类别

资金

  1. predoctoral fellowship FPI-MEC [BES-2006-13059]
  2. coordinated Spanish MEC project DINAMED [CGL2005-05830-C03-02/BOS]
  3. INTERBOS [CGL2008-04503-C03-02]
  4. DIVERBOS [CGL2011-30285-C02-02]
  5. FEDER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regeneration of Mediterranean forests is severely limited. Multiple abiotic factors are known to constrain the establishment of woody seedlings at its first phases, such as summer drought or excessive incident radiation, but less attention has been paid to the role of intra-specific variation in seedling performance. In this study we investigate the relative influence of environment (light availability, soil moisture and summer irrigation) and intrinsic factors (seed mass and maternal origin) as determinants of within-population variability in the early establishment of four coexisting Mediterranean oaks (Quercus ilex, Quercus suber, Quercus faginea and Quercus pyrenaica), from emergence and early growth to second-year survival in a field experiment. Seed size was a poor predictor of seed and seedling success. Instead, mother identity showed a stronger effect on seedling performance. Time and percentage of emergence, establishment success and morphological traits varied among seedlings from different maternal trees but main drivers for each variable were different for each species. In addition to a direct effect, in many cases mother-related intrinsic traits and seed mass influenced the effects of environmental conditions on seedling performance. The role of intrinsic factors was masked under ameliorated conditions (i.e. summer irrigation), indicating the relevant role of within-population variability to cope with highly heterogeneous and unpredictable Mediterranean environments. (C) 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据