4.1 Article

The effects of calcium hydroxide removal methods on bond strength of Epiphany SE with two irrigation protocols

期刊

ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 71, 期 3-4, 页码 989-993

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2012.741698

关键词

calcium hydroxide; removal methods; bond strength; irrigation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of five calcium hydroxide removal methods on the bond strength of Epiphany SE sealer after canal irrigation with NaOCl+EDTA or NaOCl+MTAD. Materials and methods: The 120 roots were instrumented by using the ProTaper rotary system under irrigation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and randomly divided into two major groups according to the final irrigation: 1.3% NaOCl + MTAD and 5% NaOCl + 17% EDTA. For controls, 10 roots from each of the final irrigations with NaOCl + MTAD and NaOCl + EDTA (20 roots) were not filled with Ca(OH)(2). The intra-canal paste, Ca(OH) 2 was applied to each of the 100 remaining roots and stored at 37 degrees C for 7 days. Each group was sub-divided into five sub-groups (n = 10) according to the removal technique for the intracanal dressing: Group-1: recapitulation with size 30 K file + 3 ml of saline solution, Group-2: recapitulation with size 30 K file + 3 ml of 5% NaOCl, Group-3: using 5% NaOCl + 17% EDTA, Group-4: using 5% NaOCl + 15% citric acid, and Group-5: using 1.3% NaOCl + 5 ml MTAD. The root canals were filled with Resilon and Epiphany SE sealer. The bond strength was measured. Results: The mean bond strength of Epiphany SE to root dentine irrigated with NaOCl + MTAD was lower than that of NaOCl + EDTA. The highest bond strengths were 3.31 +/- 0.057 and 2.60 +/- 0.054 in the NaOCl + citric acid group when Ca(OH)(2) was applied to roots treated with NaOCl + EDTA and NaOCl + MTAD, respectively (p < 0.05). Conclusion: For root canals treated with NaOCl + EDTA or NaOCl + MTAD, the use of NaOCl + chelating agent for Ca (OH)(2) removal does not adversely affect the bond strength of Epiphany SE to dentin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据