4.4 Article

Validation and evaluation of the volumetric measurement of cerebellopontine angle cistern as a prognostic factor of microvascular decompression for primary trigeminal neuralgia

期刊

ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA
卷 156, 期 6, 页码 1173-1179

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-014-2064-2

关键词

Cerebellopontine angle cistern; Magnetic resonance imaging; Microvascular decompression; Prognosis; Trigeminal neuralgia; Volumetric measurement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic factors of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) after microvascular decompression (MVD), and to evaluate the volumetric parameters of the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) cistern as a pathogenic factor and imaging predictor. This retrospective study included 70 patients with primary TN treated with pure MVD, followed up for at least 1 year and evaluated by high-resolution MR imaging. The volume of the CPA cistern was calculated bilaterally, and the Cistern Deviation Index was defined to represent degree of deviation of the CPA cistern. Clinical data and volumetric parameters were compared between patients with TN and age- and sex-matched controls without TN, and between the recurrent and non-recurrent patients. The transposition procedure had a better outcome than the interposition procedure (P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the volume of CPA cistern between the affected and unaffected side (152.1 +/- 50.1 vs. 179.9 +/- 63.7 mm(3), P < 0.001) in patients with TN, while no significant difference between the right and left side (158.7 +/- 44.6 vs. 163.1 +/- 49.8 mm(3), P = 0.162) in controls. The Cistern Deviation Index was significantly larger in controls than in patients with TN (P = 0.048), and in the non-recurrent patients than in recurrent patients (P = 0.040). We demonstrated that the volumetric parameters of the CPA cistern are a marker for understanding the pathogenesis of TN and useful for predicting the recurrence after MVD. The Cistern Deviation Index might contribute to deciding the surgical approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据