4.4 Article

5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA)-induced fluorescence in intracerebral metastases: a retrospective study

期刊

ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA
卷 154, 期 2, 页码 223-228

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-011-1200-5

关键词

Ala-derived fluorescence; Cerebral metastasis; Resection; Histopathological features; Surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microsurgical, circumferential stripping of intracerebral metastases often proves to be insufficient to prevent local tumor recurrence. We were interested in the potential impact of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA)-induced-fluorescence (5-AIF) as a diagnostic tool for the resection of intracerebral metastases. A retrospective analysis was performed for 52 patients who underwent 5-AIF-guided resection for intracerebral mass lesions that histologically corresponded to metastases from tumors outside the central nervous system. The presence of ALA fluorescence in the tumor was determined in each patient. In 42 patients, fluorescence of the resection cavity after tumor removal was additionally recorded. Data were correlated with neuropathological findings in tissue specimens. A total of 32 of the 52 metastases (62%) exhibited 5-AIF in tumor parts. All 5-AIF-positive metastases exhibited an inhomogeneous fluorescence pattern. 5-AIF was neither associated with the histological type nor with the site of origin of the metastases. Residual fluorescence of the resection cavity was detected after macroscopically complete white light resection in 24 patients with 5-AIF positive metastases. Residual tumor tissue was histologically confirmed in 6 of 18 patients with available tissue specimens from such 5-AIF positive areas (33%). The majority of metastases (62%) were 5-AIF positive, suggesting a potential impact of 5-AIF for improved visualization of metastatic tumor tissue within the brain. However, residual 5-AIF after macroscopically complete resection of a metastasis needs to be interpreted with caution because of the limited specificity for detection of residual tumor tissue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据