4.4 Article

Inflammasome signaling pathways exert antiviral effect against Chikungunya virus in human dermal fibroblasts

期刊

INFECTION GENETICS AND EVOLUTION
卷 32, 期 -, 页码 401-408

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.03.025

关键词

Arbovirus; Chikungunya virus; West Nile virus; Inflammasome; AIM2; Caspase 1

资金

  1. French Research Agency Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-12-BSV3-0004-01]
  2. Infectiopole Sud foundation
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-12-BSV3-0004] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arboviruses represent an emerging threat to human. They are transmitted to vertebrates by the bite of infected arthropods. Early transmission to vertebrates is initiated by skin puncture and deposition of virus in this organ. However, events at the bite site remain largely unknown. Here, we report that Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) and West Nile virus (WNV), despite belonging to distinct viral families, elicit a common antiviral signature in primary human dermal fibroblasts, attesting for the up regulation of interferon signaling pathways and leading to an increased expression of IFN-beta, interleukins and chemokines. Remarkably, CHIKV and WNV enhance IL-1 beta expression and induce maturation of caspase-1, indicating the capacity of these pathogens to elicit activation of the inflammasome program in resident skin cells. CHIKV and WNV also induce the expression of the inflammasome sensor AIM2 in dermal fibroblasts, whereas inhibition of caspase-1 and AIM2 with siRNA interferes with both CHIKV- and WNV-induced IL-1 beta production by these cells. Finally, inhibition of the inflammasome via caspase-1 silencing was found to enhance CHIKV replication in dermal fibroblasts. Together, these results indicate that the skin contributes to the pro-inflammatory and anti-viral microenvironment via the activation of the inflammasome in the early stages following infection with arboviruses. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据