4.7 Article

Deformation twinning and twinning-related fracture in nickel-base single-crystal superalloys during thermomechanical fatigue cycling

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 67, 期 -, 页码 45-57

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.12.011

关键词

Nickel-base superalloys; Deformation twins; Fracture; Crack; Thermomechanical fatigue (TMF)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50971078, 51071096, 51271097]
  2. Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation [ZR2010EM009]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [201003630]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermomechanical fatigue (TMF) tests in four < 0 0 1 >-oriented nickel-base single-crystal superalloys were studied with the aid of microstructural investigation. Three experimental observation methods optical microscopy, scanning electron microscope and transmission electron microscopy were combined to obtain new insights into the microstructural and fractographic characteristics after TMF cycling with and without a compressive hold time. After the TMF cycling, the fracture surface shows different fractographic characteristics due to the introduction of the hold time. Fundamental differences in the crack propagation mechanisms have also been discovered under the influence of the compressive hold time. Without a compressive hold time, the crack propagates inwards perpendicular to the axial stress with the aid of oxidation. During the propagation, the crack reaches the twinning plate and propagates rapidly along it with the aid of the stress field at the crack tip. There appear to be obvious steps at this propagation stage. With a compressive hold time, the crack could only propagate in approximately one twinning plate. It appears in only one crystallographic fracture plane. Due to a few deformation twins being formed in this section, the crack propagation path may change to run along other twinning plates. (C) 2013 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据