4.7 Article

Nanocrystalline Fe-C alloys produced by ball milling of iron and graphite

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 61, 期 9, 页码 3172-3185

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.02.006

关键词

Thermodynamics; Fe-C alloy; Nanocrystalline materials; Segregation; Mechanical alloying

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [KI 230/34-1, SFB 602 TP B13]
  2. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [51101121, 51125002]
  4. Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing (NWPU) [79-TP-2011]
  5. Fundamental Research Fund of NWPU [JC2001134]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of nanocrystalline Fe-C alloys with different carbon concentrations (x(tot)) up to 19.4 at.% (4.90 wt.%) are prepared by ball milling. The microstructures of these alloys are characterized by transmission electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction, and partitioning of carbon between grain boundaries and grain interiors is determined by atom probe tomography. It is found that the segregation of carbon to grain boundaries of alpha-ferrite can significantly reduce its grain size to a few nanometers. When the grain boundaries of ferrite are saturated with carbon, a metastable thermodynamic equilibrium between the matrix and the grain boundaries is approached, inducing a decreasing grain size with increasing x(tot). Eventually the size reaches a lower limit of about 6 nm in alloys with x(tot) > 6.19 at.% (1.40 wt.%); a further increase in x(tot) leads to the precipitation of carbon as Fe3C. The observed presence of an amorphous structure in 19.4 at.% C (4.90 wt.%) alloy is ascribed to a deformation-driven amorphization of Fe3C by severe plastic deformation. By measuring the temperature dependence of the grain size for an alloy with 1.77 at.% C additional evidence is provided for a metastable equilibrium reached in the nanocrystalline alloy. (C) 2013 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据